On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 05:38:10PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 04:42:18PM +0800, Xing Zheng wrote:
> > +sound {
> > + compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-gru-sound";
> > + rockchip,cpu = <&i2s0>;
> > + rockchip,codec = <&max98357a &rt5514 &da7219>;
> These seem fairly standard though a variety of versions in the bindings.
> Can we use audio-codec and audio-cpu (or cpu or audio-dai) here? Mark?
Well, the roles aren't actually that standard (the fact that there's
multiple CODECs and one CPU DAI here is really odd and definitely needs
a very system specific interpretation). If they were standard we
already have the simple-card binding that things should be using.
There's no point in standard property names if the interpretation has to
be non-standard.
The vendor specific prefixes are there because all bindings are supposed
to add prefixes to property names.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
