Hi Mark, thank for comment.
On Tue, 2016-06-07 at 16:54 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 12:56:17PM +0800, Garlic Tseng wrote:
>
> > + /*enable agent*/
>
> Lots of comments with missing spaces in them, there's quite a few
> examples of that in here.
I'll check all the code and fix them.
>
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(mtk_afe_fe_startup);
>
> All the ASoC and regmap APIs are _GPL(), you really shouldn't export new
> interfaces based on them without it - the point with the _GPL() is that
> non-GPL code shouldn't be able to use the APIs.
Thanks for comment, I'll fix them.
>
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(mtk_afe_fe_hw_params);
>
> Do you need to export the individual ops rather than just the ops
> structure?
>
Yes, in 2701 driver we modify some ops.
+/* FE DAIs */
+static const struct snd_soc_dai_ops mt2701_single_memif_dai_ops = {
+ .startup = mt2701_simple_fe_startup,
+ .shutdown = mtk_afe_fe_shutdown,
+ .hw_params = mt2701_simple_fe_hw_params,
+ .hw_free = mtk_afe_fe_hw_free,
+ .prepare = mtk_afe_fe_prepare,
+ .trigger = mtk_afe_fe_trigger,
+
+};
And here is one of them. Here MT2701 need one more reg control.
+static int mt2701_simple_fe_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream
*substream,
+ struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params,
+ struct snd_soc_dai *dai)
+{
+ struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd = substream->private_data;
+ struct mtk_base_afe *afe =
snd_soc_platform_get_drvdata(rtd->platform);
+ int stream_dir = substream->stream;
+
+ /*single DL use PAIR_INTERLEAVE*/
+ if (stream_dir == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) {
+ regmap_update_bits(afe->regmap,
+ AFE_MEMIF_PBUF_SIZE,
+ AFE_MEMIF_PBUF_SIZE_DLM_MASK,
+ AFE_MEMIF_PBUF_SIZE_PAIR_INTERLEAVE);
+ }
+ return mtk_afe_fe_hw_params(substream, params, dai);
+}
MT2701 need some specific reg controls. If the control is
platform-specific I tend not to put them in the common ops structure.
> > +int mtk_afe_fe_trigger(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int cmd,
> > + struct snd_soc_dai *dai)
> > +{
> > + struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd = substream->private_data;
> > + struct snd_pcm_runtime * const runtime = substream->runtime;
> > + struct mtk_base_afe *afe = snd_soc_platform_get_drvdata(rtd->platform);
> > + struct mtk_base_afe_memif *memif = &afe->memif[rtd->cpu_dai->id];
> > + struct mtk_base_afe_irq *irqs = &afe->irqs[memif->irq_usage];
> > + const struct mtk_base_irq_data *irq_data = irqs->irq_data;
> > + unsigned int counter = runtime->period_size;
> > + int fs;
> > +
> > + dev_info(afe->dev, "%s %s cmd=%d\n", __func__, memif->data->name, cmd);
>
> That's way too noisy, dev_dbg() at most.
OK. I'll fix it.
> > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(irqs_lock);
> > +int mtk_dynamic_irq_acquire(struct mtk_base_afe *afe)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&irqs_lock);
> > + for (i = 0; i < afe->irqs_size; ++i) {
>
> Why is the lock global and not part of the AFE struct?
I'll put it in AFE struct. Thanks.
>
> > +void mtk_simple_isr(struct mtk_base_afe *afe, struct mtk_base_afe_memif *memif)
> > +{
> > + snd_pcm_period_elapsed(memif->substream);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(mtk_simple_isr);
>
> Is this really worth it over just calling _period_elapsed() directly?
I'll remove the function and just calling period_elapsed() directly.
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
