On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 02:45:00PM +0000, Opensource [Adam Thomson] wrote: > On May 06, 2016, 13:39, Mark Brown wrote: > > > - /* Handle any DT/platform data */ > > > - if ((codec->dev->of_node) && (da7219->pdata)) > > > + /* Handle any DT/ACPI/platform data */ > > > + if (((codec->dev->of_node) || is_acpi_node(codec->dev->fwnode)) && > > > + (da7219->pdata)) > > > da7219->pdata->aad_pdata = da7219_aad_of_to_pdata(codec); > > > da7219_aad_handle_pdata(codec); > > Surely we should be able to check if there's firmware data without > > enumerating every possible firmware type? > There doesn't seem to be a unified check for this. Also, Given these are the > only two types the driver expects and supports right now, I don't see a problem > being explicit here in the checking. Again it's pointing out something that looks like it's missing from the fwnode API - if people are supposed to be able to write firmware neutral drivers they should be able to do everything they need at the fwnode level.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
