On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 02:33:04PM +0000, Opensource [Adam Thomson] wrote: > On May 06, 2016, 13:27, Mark Brown wrote: > > Is this *really* sensible? DT idioms don't always match up with ACPI > > idioms well and this isn't a trivial DT binding. > For what we're doing here, both DT and ACPI match up well, and so what I've > implemented works on both sides. There are other examples of this already in the > Linux kernel, so I don't think it's anything particularly new. No, not really - your DT is fairly unusual in how it's done and the lack of ACPI helpers is not a good sign on that side. The _DSD things are really only supposed to work for simple properties on devices. > > There's nothing device specific about this, it should go in generic > > code. > The intention was to just match against DT or ACPI and nothing else, so that > didn't feel generic enough to be pushed into the fwnode framework. However > I will take another look. That's currently the entire set of things that fwnode supports so...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
