On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:31:54PM +0800, John Hsu wrote: > On 3/9/2016 10:40 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > >This really isn't a good way to be handling things, you should be > >ensuring that platforms that have an MCLK provide one via the clock API. > >If the clock is missing that should indicate that it's the second case > >where it's not used at all. > Do you mean I should use devm_clk_get to check mclk exist instead of > nau8825->mclk in nau8825_mclk_prepare function? And return a warn- > ing message if mclk is missing? That might make sense, yes. Let's see the code.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
