Re: Codec "virtual multiplexer" representation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 18.02.2016 06:30, Andreas Dannenberg wrote:

Petr,
on a related note, I'm currently working on a combined driver (85%
complete) for TAS5720/TAS5722 which are nice but relatively simple
Class-D mono amplifiers. Despite almost having the same P/N there is
little to no similarity with TAS5721 (which gives a another example why
one should be careful with wildcard 'x' in driver names) so there is no
case for a combined driver here but let's make sure we align our
namespace to avoid collision:

tas5720.[c|h] - Driver for TAS5720/TAS5722 (WIP by Andreas)
tas5721.[c|h] - Driver for TAS5721 (WIP by Petr)

Regards,

--
Andreas Dannenberg
Texas Instruments Inc

Hi Andreas,

thanks for letting me know! In the meantime I have found there is a driver for TAS5711, TAS5717 and TAS5719. The TAS5721 is very similar to the 5711, so I will just update that driver rather than creating a new one.

One question came to my mind, which you can perhaps help me to answer as you are more familiar with these amplifiers: what is the usual representation of a 2.1 system in controls? I'm wondering that the TAS5711 has just master volume and a double slider for Ch1/Ch2, but there is no Ch3 control.
Surely that is needed as well, isn't it?

Regards
Petr

_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel



[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux