On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 16:02:35 +0100, Brian Austin wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > So we stay at SNDRV_PCM_RATE_192000 always for sample rate defines? > > > And everything else is just covered with SNDRV_PCM_RATE_KNOT? > > > > Depends. If a new sample rate is (or will be) demanded by many > > drivers, it's worth to add it, of course, as it would simplify the > > code. > > > > That's why I mentioned "why" is most important information; you need > > to convince others about the necessity of this change, after all. > > Then you see that "because I-wanna-it" doesn't sound convincing > > enough, right? > > > > > > Takashi > > > I really, really, really want it :) > > I understand. Going forward, from our perspective, 384 and > other high sample rates are going to be defaults for devices as the market > is moving that way. I just wanted to make it easier to use those instead > of doing all the contraint coding. Yeah that's the reason I could *guess*, but it wasn't mentioned. > Now my understanding on the KNOT define > may be wrong. I can add the other rates to this, but for now just wanted > to add one we use currently. > > Does that make sense? Just resubmit the patch with mo' better advertisement :) Takashi _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
