On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > So we stay at SNDRV_PCM_RATE_192000 always for sample rate defines? > > And everything else is just covered with SNDRV_PCM_RATE_KNOT? > > Depends. If a new sample rate is (or will be) demanded by many > drivers, it's worth to add it, of course, as it would simplify the > code. > > That's why I mentioned "why" is most important information; you need > to convince others about the necessity of this change, after all. > Then you see that "because I-wanna-it" doesn't sound convincing > enough, right? > > > Takashi > I really, really, really want it :) I understand. Going forward, from our perspective, 384 and other high sample rates are going to be defaults for devices as the market is moving that way. I just wanted to make it easier to use those instead of doing all the contraint coding. Now my understanding on the KNOT define may be wrong. I can add the other rates to this, but for now just wanted to add one we use currently. Does that make sense? _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
