On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 11:42:23AM +0900, Takashi Sakamoto wrote: > On Dec 07 2015 11:21, Jonathan Woithe wrote: > >In general that's true. For the FF400 at least though the non-nodeID > >component is effectively hard coded on other systems. If this is used > >solely as an address then we wouldn't have to follow that convention > >obviously, but this assertion would have to be confirmed valid in practice. > > I think you mention about a part of value except for node ID. Yes, that's what I was referring to. Sorry for not being clearer. > In my former example (0xFFC74567), it's 0x4547. Right. Node ID is in the upper 16 bits, and another value (0x4547 in the above example) in the lower 16 bits. > You mean that Fireface 400 ignores the part and sends transactions to the > fixed local address (i.e. 0x'0001'0000'0000). No, what I meant was that the low part (the 0x4547 in your example) is always 0x0001 on other systems for the FF400. Apologies for the confusion. > The model can reasonably send transactions to the address which the driver > registered. Ok, that's good. It means we're free to choose exactly what suits us. jonathan _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
