Hi, On Dec 07 2015 11:21, Jonathan Woithe wrote:
In general that's true. For the FF400 at least though the non-nodeID component is effectively hard coded on other systems. If this is used solely as an address then we wouldn't have to follow that convention obviously, but this assertion would have to be confirmed valid in practice.
I think you mention about a part of value except for node ID. In my former example (0xFFC74567), it's 0x4547.
You mean that Fireface 400 ignores the part and sends transactions to the fixed local address (i.e. 0x'0001'0000'0000).
Although, this is against the fact that I got in my experiences with Fireface 400. The model can reasonably send transactions to the address which the driver registered.
Regards Takashi Sakamoto _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
