On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > В сообщении от 10 сентября 2010 11:43:14 автор Jassi Brar написал: >> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Mark Brown >> >> <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 09:56:23PM +0900, Jassi Brar wrote: >> >> I would like to have points to consider from every stakeholder. >> > >> > I don't really have anything myself, though I may have some comments on >> > the actual proposal I guess. >> >> Btw, AC97, PCM and DMA were easy kill. >> >> It's I2S that's PITA. >> I am thinking of leaving 24xx-i2s, i.e pre-64xx(shared with 2412), >> unchanged and letting >> them die of old age (obsoleted and dropped duly if no stakeholder keeps >> up). > > Does it mean there's no one to support s3c24xx-i2s (for s3c24xx socs)? As Mark said, there are indeed some people. Just I don't have the h/w handy to work and test any changes. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
