В сообщении от 10 сентября 2010 11:43:14 автор Jassi Brar написал: > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Mark Brown > > <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 09:56:23PM +0900, Jassi Brar wrote: > >> I would like to have points to consider from every stakeholder. > > > > I don't really have anything myself, though I may have some comments on > > the actual proposal I guess. > > Btw, AC97, PCM and DMA were easy kill. > > It's I2S that's PITA. > I am thinking of leaving 24xx-i2s, i.e pre-64xx(shared with 2412), > unchanged and letting > them die of old age (obsoleted and dropped duly if no stakeholder keeps > up). Does it mean there's no one to support s3c24xx-i2s (for s3c24xx socs)?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
