On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Liam Girdwood <lrg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 17:26 +0900, Seungwhan Youn wrote: >> >>>>> + return snd_soc_register_dai(dev, drv); >> >>>> How about s3c64xx-i2s? I think, if this patch fixes all errors in >> >>> Sorry, I confused your comment. >> >>> What do you mean "How about s3c64xx-i2s" ? >> >> >> >> Actually 'sound/soc/s3c24xx/s3c64xx-i2s.c' has same error. >> >> >> >> So, If this patch's purpose is to fix compile error, my opinion is >> >> that this patch fix all the same errors in 'sound/soc/s3c24xx/'. >> > >> > The 'sound/soc/s3c24xx/s3c64xx-i2s.c' haven't directly called >> > 'snd_soc_register_dai()' function. >> > It is call 's3c_i2sv2_register_dai()' in 'sound/soc/s3c24xx/s3c-i2s-v2.c' >> > to register a DAI. >> > >> >> Oh, I was confused about this even I modify this few days ago. >> I'm sorry that I make you to be confused. >> > > I'm confused too ;) > > Is this to be applied or not ? I think this okay. :) > > Liam > -- > Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd > ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer. > http://www.slimlogic.co.uk > > _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
