On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 17:26 +0900, Seungwhan Youn wrote: > >>>>> + return snd_soc_register_dai(dev, drv); > >>>> How about s3c64xx-i2s? I think, if this patch fixes all errors in > >>> Sorry, I confused your comment. > >>> What do you mean "How about s3c64xx-i2s" ? > >> > >> Actually 'sound/soc/s3c24xx/s3c64xx-i2s.c' has same error. > >> > >> So, If this patch's purpose is to fix compile error, my opinion is > >> that this patch fix all the same errors in 'sound/soc/s3c24xx/'. > > > > The 'sound/soc/s3c24xx/s3c64xx-i2s.c' haven't directly called > > 'snd_soc_register_dai()' function. > > It is call 's3c_i2sv2_register_dai()' in 'sound/soc/s3c24xx/s3c-i2s-v2.c' > > to register a DAI. > > > > Oh, I was confused about this even I modify this few days ago. > I'm sorry that I make you to be confused. > I'm confused too ;) Is this to be applied or not ? Liam -- Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer. http://www.slimlogic.co.uk _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
