On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 09:49:03PM +0900, jassi brar wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:38 PM, Mark Brown > >> > I agree that this is the only really controversial change, but it seemed >> > like pretty much all the changes that added stuff to the headers or used >> > them could've been done pre-move so that they didn't depend on it. > >> Not sure which patch you point, but it was decision of logical >> build-up and successful >> compilation after each patch that made the patch series as it is now. > > Pretty much all of them - for example, patch 11 adds a bunch of new > bitfield definitions to the header. This change didn't really need the > header to have been moved before it was made, it could have been done > pre-move. Dear that wud have defeated the very purpose of header moving -- don't wanna depend on changes surfacing via ARCH tree after too long. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
