On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 09:49:03PM +0900, jassi brar wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:38 PM, Mark Brown > > I agree that this is the only really controversial change, but it seemed > > like pretty much all the changes that added stuff to the headers or used > > them could've been done pre-move so that they didn't depend on it. > Not sure which patch you point, but it was decision of logical > build-up and successful > compilation after each patch that made the patch series as it is now. Pretty much all of them - for example, patch 11 adds a bunch of new bitfield definitions to the header. This change didn't really need the header to have been moved before it was made, it could have been done pre-move. Keeping things building is important and some of the changes that affected both S3C24xx and S3C64xx might've needed the move for that but not all of them. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
