I can confirm that this patch applies to HP dv2700 subsystem 103c:30d6 (at least with
- {0x17, AC_VERB_SET_AMP_GAIN_MUTE, AMP_IN_UNMUTE(1) | 0x03},
+ {0x17, AC_VERB_SET_AMP_GAIN_MUTE, AMP_IN_UNMUTE(0) | 0x03},
).
Node 0x14 supports multiple connections to 0x17 (0x01) and 0x1d (0x00); 0x1d is apparently not working;
Also, I don't understand if 0x15-0x18 are working. It doesn't do anything here, but it might be stuff from the expansion slot (?)
On Sunday 24 January 2010 11:32:27 Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Tue, 12 Jan 2010 10:07:02 +0100,
> I wrote:
> >
> > At Fri, 8 Jan 2010 09:09:54 +0100 (CET),
> > Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, 3 Jan 2010, knprox@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Ken Prox <kprox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ken Prox <kprox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > I've applied your patch to my "devel" git tree with space/tab
> > > replacements. Please, use same coding style matching other ALSA code and
> > > run "scripts/checkpatch.pl" on your patch before posting. Thanks.
> >
> > I pulled your branches now to sound git tree.
>
> And, now I'm checking the code and your change again while I'm working
> on fixing / clean-up of cxt5051 code. I don't understand why your patch
> works. Does it really work as is?
>
> For example, the pin 0x17 has no multiple connections. So, changing
> the amp for the input #1 doesn't make sense at all. If it supports only
> the pin 0x1d, then the init verbs have to be different.
>
> Doesn't another model, e.g. model=hp-dv6736, work as is?
>
>
> thanks,
>
> Takashi
> _______________________________________________
> Alsa-devel mailing list
> Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
