At Tue, 12 Jan 2010 10:07:02 +0100, I wrote: > > At Fri, 8 Jan 2010 09:09:54 +0100 (CET), > Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > > > > On Sun, 3 Jan 2010, knprox@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > From: Ken Prox <kprox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ken Prox <kprox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > I've applied your patch to my "devel" git tree with space/tab > > replacements. Please, use same coding style matching other ALSA code and > > run "scripts/checkpatch.pl" on your patch before posting. Thanks. > > I pulled your branches now to sound git tree. And, now I'm checking the code and your change again while I'm working on fixing / clean-up of cxt5051 code. I don't understand why your patch works. Does it really work as is? For example, the pin 0x17 has no multiple connections. So, changing the amp for the input #1 doesn't make sense at all. If it supports only the pin 0x1d, then the init verbs have to be different. Doesn't another model, e.g. model=hp-dv6736, work as is? thanks, Takashi _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
