On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi all, > > I agree with the previous posts in this thread. > > The use of > 48kHz sample rate is common use today, so if the hardware supports > it, the driver should not disable it. > > Since there are some users that successfully use SPDIF with > 48kHz, it cannot > be a general hardware problem. If there's a general hardware problem, then > it would never work for anyone. > > If there are some codec chips/variants/versions, or even certain boards that > have bad SPDIf signal performance, then we should black-list those bad > chips/versions/boards, rather than disable the feature for everyone. > > Also, as far as I understand, the worst thing that can happen when a "too high" > sample rate is used: It will not work for some users on some hardware. That, > I think, is acceptable (if no workaround / black-list can be created). > > This would be different if there are other effects: If the high sample rate > would cause some hardware-lock-up or similar, then it definitely needs to be > disabled. > > Regards, > -- > - Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ > ============================================================================ > "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." > (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6) > Hi, All According to the discussion, this patch is canceled, thank you for suggestion. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
