Troy Kisky wrote: > Troy Kisky wrote: >> Mark Brown wrote: >> >> Even when using SDRAM, there is still another advantage to double buffering. >> That is tolerating very long interrupt latency on dma completion. The current >> code sets up the next periods dma transfer on dma completion. This could easily >> lead to underruns. So, even in this case, I think double buffering is worth >> the extra dma engine copy. >> > I overstated my case, it still would not "easily" happen. In fact, I now agree with you :^) Thanks Troy _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel