Troy Kisky wrote: > Mark Brown wrote: > > Even when using SDRAM, there is still another advantage to double buffering. > That is tolerating very long interrupt latency on dma completion. The current > code sets up the next periods dma transfer on dma completion. This could easily > lead to underruns. So, even in this case, I think double buffering is worth > the extra dma engine copy. > I overstated my case, it still would not "easily" happen. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
