Re: [PATCH 1/1] hdsp: allow firmware loading from inside the kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1
Takashi Iwai a écrit :> At Tue, 12 May 2009 10:01:20 +0200,> Raphaël Doursenaud wrote:>> Takashi Iwai a écrit :>>> At Tue, 12 May 2009 09:41:36 +0200,>>> Raphaël Doursenaud wrote:>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----->>>> Hash: SHA1>>>>>>>> Takashi Iwai a écrit :>>>>> At Tue, 12 May 2009 09:25:27 +0200,>>>>> Raphaël Doursenaud wrote:>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----->>>>>> Hash: SHA1>>>>>>>>>>>> Takashi Iwai a écrit :>>>>>>> At Tue, 12 May 2009 09:05:19 +0200,>>>>>>> Raphaël Doursenaud wrote:>>>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----->>>>>>>> Hash: SHA1>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Takashi Iwai a écrit :>>>>>>>>> At Tue, 12 May 2009 08:47:29 +0200,>>>>>>>>> Raphaël Doursenaud wrote:>>>>>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----->>>>>>>>>> Hash: SHA1>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Takashi Iwai a écrit :>>>>>>>>>>> At Tue, 12 May 2009 08:16:08 +0200,>>>>>>>>>>> Raphaël Doursenaud wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Raphaël Doursenaud <rdoursenaud@xxxxxxx>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Allow the use of  the FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL option with hdsp cards and>>>>>>>>>>>> in-kernel driver.>>>>>>>>>>> Did it really work without problems?>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Takashi>>>>>>>>>> Tested over the weekend with two multifaces in my DAW.>>>>>>>>>> Got no problem.>>>>>>>>> Interesting.>>>>>>>>> Did you build the firmware file into the kernel, or not?>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Takashi>>>>>>>> Yes I built all hdsp fimware files (multiface_firmware.bin>>>>>>>> multiface_firmware_rev11.bin digiface_firmware.bin>>>>>>>> digiface_firmware_rev11.bin) into the kernel.>>>>>>>> It's the aim of this patch.>>>>>>> Well, the problem I'm concerned is that the driver can be compiled>>>>>>> in even if you have no built-in firmware.  And there is no restriction>>>>>>> or dependency check in Kconfig, so far.>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you test how the kernel behaves without the built-in firmware?>>>>>>> Does it hang or give any critical error?>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks,>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Takashi>>>>>> Could you be more specific?>>>>>> I'm not sure to understand why it could be a problem.>>>>>> Do you think that if I set FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL without compiling the>>>>>> firmware(s) in-kernel the request_firmware() will not resolve and cause>>>>>> an error?>>>>> Yes, exactly.>>>>> request_firmware() shall fail in that case likely after a long>>>>> time-out (unless you have the firmware files in initrd) because there>>>>> is really no file / data available at the time it's called.>>>>> And I'm not sure whether this could lead to a fatal operation error.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Takashi>>>> AFAIK this is handled in the code (from line 5080) and should lead to>>>> "Hammerfall-DSP: couldn't get firmware from userspace. try using hdsploader">>> Yep, a fallback mechanism is found in hdsp driver itself.>>> But the driver probe hangs for too long time, and I'm just worried>>> about its influence on the whole kernel boot-up.>>>>>>> I'm building a kernel to test that case.>>> Thanks.>>>>>>>>> Takashi>> Wow, you're right! Didn't think about that...>>>> It hangs for about 45s on :>> Hammerfall-DSP: wait for FIFO status <= 0 failed after 30 iterations>> RME Hammerfall DSP 0000:05:02.0: firmware: requesting>> multiface_firmware_rev11.bin>>>> before going on with :>> Hammerfall-DSP: cannot load firmware multiface_firmware_rev11.bin>> Hammerfall-DSP: couldn't get firmware from userspace. try using hdsploader>> Hammerfall-DSP: card initialization pending : waiting for firmware> > OK, so it doesn't lead to any critical error?> Then it's better than the worst case I thought of :)> >> I wonder what would be the best way to deal with that while still>> enabling in-kernel firmware.> > Well, it's basically a problem of the request_firmware() itself, so> we can't fix the behavior properly in the driver side.  There is an> option to use *_nowait() call, but this will end up with a mess of> code flow, I'm afraid.> > So, I'm going to apply your patch.  But, maybe we should add a warning> in Kconfig comment, such as> > comment "Don't forget to add built-in firmwares for HDSP driver"> 	depends on SND_HDSP=y> > or so...  Suggestions of a better text are appreciated.> > > thanks,> > Takashi
mmm sounds good to me.With the patch I'm about to propose to correct the firmwares path itshould fit most situations.
Thanks a lot for your input!
- --Raphaël Doursenaud-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkoJO9oACgkQaZKmNAdXaVU+gwCgmJz3c5YMbtF4KMYkSFX/8m21L9cAnRc25qVBD57HeUtriA/tDDBI6vO7=RnGG-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----_______________________________________________Alsa-devel mailing listAlsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux