On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 01:06:55PM +0800, Eric Miao wrote:>> These are unnecessary since the compiler is smart enough to optimize>> the code away if CONFIG_PXA3xx is not defined, when cpu_is_pxa3xx()>> will just be expanded to constant 0.>> This isn't done for compiler optimisation - it's done because the> register bit macros are only defined if PXA3xx support is being built> in. I've no problem with removing those guards but without that you'll> get build failures on PXA2xx.> Yeah, indeed. This is a rush (so the title is RFC), sorry. I'll get thoseconditional #ifdef .. #endif removed as well in the ssp-regs.h, italways makes me upset. And possibly to get ssp-regs.h mergedinto ssp.h. No one else now wants to use either one of theseheader files. -- Cheers- eric_______________________________________________Alsa-devel mailing listAlsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
