On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:39:38AM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote: > To me, using ssp_dev seems to be cleaner, as all the places where > ssp_set_scr is called, we already have an ssp_dev *ssp = priv->dev.ssp > set up, which allows us to call ssp_set_scr(ssp, ...) instead of > ssp_set_scr(&priv->dev, ...). Same for ssp_get_scr. Yeah, the combination of ssp_dev and ssp_device is icky in general and largely historical as a result of a partially done transition of the driver to ssp_device. I'll apply the patch - thanks! _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
