On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 07:20:15PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Sunday 12 of April 2009 19:06:26 Mark Brown wrote:
> > > +static struct platform_device palmld_pxa2xx_pcm = {
> > This should follow the pattern that everything else uses with the struct
> > platform_device in devices.c and board files triggering registration of
> > that.
> Half of the platforms use static struct, half use struct. Probably someone
> should send a huge patch to make it consistent. I'd like to have it
> consistent at least inside the platform file.
The general rule is that if it's a part of the CPU it should go in
devices.c - things that aren't doing that are mostly just waiting for
cleanup.
> > > +static struct platform_device palmld_pxa2xx_ac97 = {
> > > + .name = "pxa2xx-ac97",
> > > + .id = -1,
> > > + .dev = {
> > > + .platform_data = &palmld_ac97_pdata,
> > > + },
> > > +};
> > No, use pxa_set_ac97_info().
> How?
Pass the platform data as the argument. This will currently involve
merging the two different platform data structures that we have right
now.
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
