On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 02:10:54PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Should this be handled like a casual gpio (ie. gpio 99) ? > > I'm not sure what you mean by a casual GPIO? > I meant different from "special" gpios (ie. GPIO95 and GPIO113), which are > "special" because they have an alternate function tied to AC97 reset. Ah, I see - for reference, a more normal term would be something like generic. I didn't mean it was essential support them right now, just that it'd be better to allow for them in the interface in case we need the same workaround again. But yes, this looks good - I've applied it, thanks. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
