Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Could you change this to provide an explicit way of specifying that (eg, > with -1 as the GPIO)? Sure. > There are other things we might want platform data for in future - passing > data to the AC97 codec, for example - so we can't rely on people not > specifying platform data for anything. I don't understand the "anything". What should be done if pdata is passed with reset_gpio = 0 then ? Should this be considered as the default case and transformed into 113 ? That sounds a bit buggy, because if someone changes his code to include platform_data support, they'll have to init platform_data anyway, and fill in reset_gpio field. Should this be handled like a casual gpio (ie. gpio 99) ? -- Robert _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
