Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:21:17AM -0400, Matthew Ranostay wrote: >> Mark Brown wrote: > >>> For line outputs I think providing that information in the device name >>> would be better - the reason for providing the distinction in the switch >>> is to provide information when the function of the device attached to >>> the jack changes at runtime. As far as the hardware is concerned one >>> line output is much the same as another. > >> err = snd_jack_new(codec->bus->card, >> "Jack Detection", >> SND_JACK_HEADPHONE | SND_JACK_LINEOUT, &spec->jack); > >> Do you mean something like this? > > I'm not sure exactly what you mean by that change. What the code says > is that you have a single jack and can detect at runtime if the device > plugged into it is a line or headphone. If that is the case then yes, > you should do something like that though that's not a very good name for > the jack (ideally it should correspond to something like the label given > to the jack on the machine case). > Well is generally only one HP out jack, but there can be several line-out reported by the one instance(lineout_jack). I assume this isn't the correct usage. >> Of course this will require some changes >> in snd_jack_report. > > Could you explain what changes you think are required? The API already > supports multi-function jacks. > _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
