On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:21:17AM -0400, Matthew Ranostay wrote: > Mark Brown wrote: > > For line outputs I think providing that information in the device name > > would be better - the reason for providing the distinction in the switch > > is to provide information when the function of the device attached to > > the jack changes at runtime. As far as the hardware is concerned one > > line output is much the same as another. > err = snd_jack_new(codec->bus->card, > "Jack Detection", > SND_JACK_HEADPHONE | SND_JACK_LINEOUT, &spec->jack); > Do you mean something like this? I'm not sure exactly what you mean by that change. What the code says is that you have a single jack and can detect at runtime if the device plugged into it is a line or headphone. If that is the case then yes, you should do something like that though that's not a very good name for the jack (ideally it should correspond to something like the label given to the jack on the machine case). > Of course this will require some changes > in snd_jack_report. Could you explain what changes you think are required? The API already supports multi-function jacks. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
