On 13-09-24, 17:21, Vinod Koul wrote: > On 11-09-24, 14:31, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 04:02:29PM +0300, Péter Ujfalusi wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 10/09/2024 15:40, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > > > > The prop->src_dpn_prop and prop.sink_dpn_prop is allocated for the _number_ > > > > of ports and it is forced as 0 index based. > > > > > > > > The original code was correct while the change to walk the bits and use > > > > their position as index into the arrays is not correct. > > > > > > > > For exmple we can have the prop.source_ports=0x2, which means we have one > > > > port, but the prop.src_dpn_prop[1] is accessing outside of the allocated > > > > memory. > > > > > > > > This reverts commit 6fa78e9c41471fe43052cd6feba6eae1b0277ae3. > > > > > > I just noticed that Krzysztof already sent the revert patch but it is > > > not picked up for stable-6.10.y > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240909164746.136629-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > Is this in Linus's tree yet? That's what we are waiting for. > > Yes I was waiting for that as well, the pull request has been sent to > Linus, this should be in his tree, hopefully tomorow.. It is in Linus's tree now. Greg would you like to drop commit 6fa78e9c41471fe43052cd6feba6eae1b0277ae3 or carry it and the revert...? What is the usual process for you to handle reverts? -- ~Vinod
