On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 01:16:01AM +0000, Ki-Seok Jo wrote: > > > > > > I have no intention of opposing the content. I am asking again because I > > didn't receive any warnings when I did the following, and I suspect I might > > have done something wrong. > > > > > > > > > ./scripts/checkpatch.pl > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/irondevice,sma1307.yaml > > > > > > total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 54 lines checked > > > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/irondevice,sma1307.yaml has no > > obvious style problems and is ready for submission. > > > > > > I was under the impression that this only applied to patched files as > > described above. It turns out it can also be used with patch files. Thank you > > for the useful information! > > > > > > > That's not how you run checkpatch. You run it on the patch. Please read > > submitting-patches document. It explains everything. > > > > Best regards, > > Krzysztof > > > Hi, > > I am in the process of carefully incorporating your feedback and making the necessary revisions. > > May I kindly ask you a question, if it's not too much trouble? > When running checkpatch, what would be the best way to address the following warning? > > WARNING: Prefer a maximum 75 chars per line (possible unwrapped commit description?) > #21: > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/irondevice,sma1307.yaml > > In this case, would it be better for me to add a line break in the patch file, or should I leave it as is? Normally I would say you can ignore this, and that checkpatch doesn't usually complain about the actually git output in here - but I think checkpatch "broke" because you did not provide any commit message body at all, so it starting parsing the git output instead. You need to write a body! > WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating? > #65: > new file mode 100644 > > If the warning is appearing because it's a new file, is it something that can be safely ignored, or should I make changes to the MAINTAINERS file? > > Thank you for your feedback. I am learning a lot of new things! Usually for bindings, which have maintainers listed in them, you can skip adding a MAINTAINERS entry. Cheers, Conor.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature