On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 14:00:58 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
> store the result of wait_for_*() functions causing patterns like:
>
> timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
> if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
>
> with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
> obvious and self explaining.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/3] slimbus: messaging: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
commit: 0eb9dda9d1db40acbabe923fe22c002e13890d39
[2/3] slimbus: qcom-ctrl: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
commit: 7d317b95d0334371481ec00ca31f5bf76bae8a82
[3/3] slimbus: qcom-ngd-ctrl: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
commit: 9f5fd5e2aebf06c37355cacc7f4b4410bc0ea233
Best regards,
--
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx>
