Mark Brown a écrit : > On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 02:44:43PM +0200, Sedji Gaouaou wrote: > >>> Ah, right. While I understand that the hardware is pretty much identical >>> are you sure that the APIs for accessing it are the same on both AVR32 >>> and AT91? My understanding was that there was some work required to > >> Actually I based my patch on the at32-pcm and at32-ssc files which were >> based on at91-ssc and at91-pcm files, so I don't think there should be >> any differences. > > Right, they're based on each other but they use different APIs to access > the hardware - this is the most substantial difference between them. > Are you sure that the API you have chosen to use is availiable for both > architectures? It's possible that it is but there's no mention of this > issue in your patch description and I'd like to confirm. > _______________________________________________ > Alsa-devel mailing list > Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel > If you are talking about the API to access ssc(ssc_writel and ssc_readl), it was basically why I needed a new driver in the first place. Indeed we wanted to use the same API across all atmel platforms. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
