On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 06:00:37PM +0200, Sedji Gaouaou wrote: > Yes my mistake!! I will change change right now. Nevertheless I don't > even have a AVR compiler so I can't really test the AVR code.... Ah, right. While I understand that the hardware is pretty much identical are you sure that the APIs for accessing it are the same on both AVR32 and AT91? My understanding was that there was some work required to handle both but I've no familiarity with either architecture. CCing in Haavard Skinnemoen for AVR32 advice: Haavard, Sedji is submitting patches which unify the audio support for AT91 and AVR32. > Ok, no worries. I will create: > a patch that contains the atmel_ssc_dai.c and .h file, > a patch for the atmel-pcm.c/.h files > a patch playback_wm8510.c and sam9g20_wm8731.c files. > a patch for the Makefile and the Kconfig. > Is that ok? That's certainly good for review. We can always squash the patches down when they go to git in order to try to preserve the history. No need to keep reposting the patch to remove the old drivers, either (unless you switch to using git format-patch -M to show the code moving around). _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
