Takashi Iwai wrote: > Oh, OK, then I must have missed that. Could you repost? > And, this *must* go to 2.6.27, or not? The only patch that needs to go into 2.6.27 is the one titled "alsa: make the CS4270 driver a new-style I2C driver" from me. This one is missing from Linus' tree. I notice that "ALSA: ASoC: Fix another cs4270 error path" is in Linus' tree, but nothing else is. > Frankly, this series of cs4270 patches have been hard to handle > because it was always unclear what the patch is for. > The description "It's for 2.6.x" is too ambiguous because it doesn't > always mean the purpose but also can mean the based version of the > patch. So, a more clear sign would be really helpful for me at the > next time... I can do that, but I'm not sure how I can be any clearer. "This is for 2.6.x", to me at least, means exactly that - that this patch should be applied to the branch for 2.6.27, which is either a release candidate (i.e. 2.6.27-rcX) or a bug fix (i.e. 2.6.27.x), depending on what's next. If you want me to use different wording, just tell me what I should say. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
