> > +static const struct sdw_device_id rt1320_id[] = {
> > + SDW_SLAVE_ENTRY_EXT(0x025d, 0x1320, 0x3, 0x0, 0),
> > + SDW_SLAVE_ENTRY_EXT(0x025d, 0x1320, 0x3, 0x1, 0),
> > + {},
>
> Sorry, not following why one of the two entries in the table is an SDCA class
> device and the other not - both rely on SDCA controls/entities/functions/etc.
> That doesn't really align with the notion that VA and VB only differ by their DSP
> capabilities, so not sure what the 0/1 difference means.
VA/VB will use class id 0 because of the hardware issue.
VC will fix this and use the class id 1.
