Hello Andy, On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 12:02:50PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 10:47 AM Uwe Kleine-König > <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > These drivers don't use the driver_data member of struct i2c_device_id, > > so don't explicitly initialize this member. > > > > This prepares putting driver_data in an anonymous union which requires > > either no initialization or named designators. But it's also a nice > > cleanup on its own. > > There are some drivers that have other (than I²C) ID tables, which > follow the same format. Can you also do the same with them for the > sake of consistency? I'm aware of these and plan to address them in a separate quest once I'm done with the i2c bits. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
