We have just started trying this out as an alternative to i2c, and picked out the following: On Wednesday 27 August 2008 10:39, Bryan Wu wrote: > -#if defined(CONFIG_I2C) || defined(CONFIG_I2C_MODULE) > +#if defined (CONFIG_I2C) || defined (CONFIG_I2C_MODULE) && !defined > (CONFIG_SND_SOC_WM8731_SPI) I think this needs extra brackets round the ||'s before the && thus: > +#if (defined (CONFIG_I2C) || defined (CONFIG_I2C_MODULE)) && !defined > (CONFIG_SND_SOC_WM8731_SPI) in order to force use of SPI when (CONFIG_SND_SOC_WM8731_SPI) and (CONFIG_I2C) are both defined. Or have we misunderstood the intention? This is in 2 other places also in the patch. Alan _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel