At Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:04:06 +0200,
I wrote:
>
> At Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:50:15 +0200,
> =?UTF-8?Q?Vedran_Mileti=C4=87?= wrote:
> >
> > Hopefully this is it.
>
> Sorry, no. It's broken. I guess you edited the patch manually?
> Regenerate the patch via git diff please.
>
> > BTW, while at it, let's fix one more thing. In jack, this card (PHASE
> > 22) shows playback_1, playback_2, playback_3...playback_8. Last 6 are
> > useless because this card has only two analog outputs. They really
> > don't output anywhere. I would say that it's probably that PHASE 22
> > and PHASE 28 share that part of code, while they shouldn't.
> >
> > Can you point to the code which creates those devices?
>
> ice1724.c.
More to follow, the patch below might fix the problem.
Takashi
diff --git a/sound/pci/ice1712/ice1724.c b/sound/pci/ice1712/ice1724.c
index 60119d2..7bb99df 100644
--- a/sound/pci/ice1712/ice1724.c
+++ b/sound/pci/ice1712/ice1724.c
@@ -942,7 +942,7 @@ static int snd_vt1724_playback_pro_open(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
{
struct snd_pcm_runtime *runtime = substream->runtime;
struct snd_ice1712 *ice = snd_pcm_substream_chip(substream);
- int chs;
+ int chs, num_indeps;
runtime->private_data = (void *)&vt1724_playback_pro_reg;
ice->playback_pro_substream = substream;
@@ -952,7 +952,8 @@ static int snd_vt1724_playback_pro_open(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
set_rate_constraints(ice, substream);
mutex_lock(&ice->open_mutex);
/* calculate the currently available channels */
- for (chs = 0; chs < 3; chs++) {
+ num_indeps = ice->num_total_dacs / 2 - 1;
+ for (chs = 0; chs < num_indeps; chs++) {
if (ice->pcm_reserved[chs])
break;
}
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
