On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 03:04:57PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > While transitioning ASoC code for iov_iter usages, I kept the argument > name as "buf" as the original code. But, iov_iter is an iterator, and > using the name "buf" may be misleading: the crucial difference is that > iov_iter can be proceeded after the operation, hence it can't be > passed twice, while a simple "buffer" sounds as if reusable. Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
