On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 10:46:13PM +0000, Justin Stitt wrote: > `strncpy` is deprecated for use on NUL-terminated destination strings [1]. > > A suitable replacement is `strscpy` [2] due to the fact that it > guarantees NUL-termination on its destination buffer argument which is > _not_ always the case for `strncpy`! > > In this case, though, there was care taken to ensure that the > destination buffer would be NUL-terminated. The destination buffer is > zero-initialized and each `pm860x->name[i]` has a size of > `MAX_NAME_LENGTH + 1`. This means that there is unlikely to be a bug > here. > > However, in an attempt to eliminate the usage of the `strncpy` API as > well as disambiguate implementations, replacements such as: `strscpy`, > `strscpy_pad`, `strtomem` and `strtomem_pad` should be preferred. > > We are able to eliminate the need for `len + 1` since `strscpy` > guarantees NUL-termination for its destination buffer as per its > implementation [3]: > > | /* Hit buffer length without finding a NUL; force NUL-termination. */ > | if (res) > | dest[res-1] = '\0'; > > [1]: www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strncpy-on-nul-terminated-strings > [2]: manpages.debian.org/testing/linux-manual-4.8/strscpy.9.en.html > [3]: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.3/source/lib/string.c#L183 > > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/90 > Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > sound/soc/codecs/88pm860x-codec.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/88pm860x-codec.c b/sound/soc/codecs/88pm860x-codec.c > index 3574c68e0dda..d99b674d574b 100644 > --- a/sound/soc/codecs/88pm860x-codec.c > +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/88pm860x-codec.c > @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ struct pm860x_priv { > struct pm860x_det det; > > int irq[4]; > - unsigned char name[4][MAX_NAME_LEN+1]; > + unsigned char name[4][MAX_NAME_LEN]; > }; > > /* -9450dB to 0dB in 150dB steps ( mute instead of -9450dB) */ > @@ -1373,7 +1373,7 @@ static int pm860x_codec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return -EINVAL; > } > pm860x->irq[i] = res->start + chip->irq_base; > - strncpy(pm860x->name[i], res->name, MAX_NAME_LEN); > + strscpy(pm860x->name[i], res->name, MAX_NAME_LEN); res->name is (perhaps) unbounded in length: struct resource { ... const char *name; ... }; So reducing struct pm860x_priv::name's size _might_ have a user-visible effect, but probably not. Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> -Kees -- Kees Cook