On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 11:56:08AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 12:27:24AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 08:30:18PM +0000, Justin Stitt wrote: > > > `strncpy` is deprecated for use on NUL-terminated destination strings [1]. > > > > > > A suitable replacement is `strscpy` [2] due to the fact that it > > > guarantees NUL-termination on its destination buffer argument which is > > > _not_ the case for `strncpy`! > > > > Please don't send new patches in reply to old patches or serieses, this > > makes it harder for both people and tools to understand what is going > > on - it can bury things in mailboxes and make it difficult to keep track > > of what current patches are, both for the new patches and the old ones. > > Hm, I see "X-Mailer: b4 0.12.3". Is this a default behavior of b4? (If > so, that needs fixing.) I don't believe this is the default behavior of b4 but somehow it happened. I believe I did a dry-run of this v2 before sending it and somehow it replied to the top-level thread? I have no idea but I'll double check before I attempt sending a vN next time. > > -- > Kees Cook
