On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 09:00:09AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > Mark Brown wrote: > > For KernelCI we've got coverage on both. I can also run stuff on the > > boards I have in my lab on demand of course, but there's more coverage > > in KernelCI. > OK, now I applied those two patches to for-next branch (i.e. for 6.6 > kernel). Let's watch out. I'm seeing failures on my i.MX6 boards, both the Q and DL have started failing in the same way: # default.time3.0.0.0.PLAYBACK - 44.1kHz stereo large periods # default.time3.0.0.0.PLAYBACK hw_params.RW_INTERLEAVED.S16_LE.44100.2.16383.131064 sw_params.131064 not ok 10 default.time3.0.0.0.PLAYBACK # time mismatch: expected 2000ms got 2229 reliably (the actual time drifts by a few ms). The other boards I've got coverage of seem fine, and I didn't check any broader CI yet.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
