On Sat, 24 Jun 2023 03:36:11 +0200, Joseph C. Sible wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 3:36 AM Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Thanks for checking. So the additional delay didn't help at all, > > i.e. it's no timing issue. We need to figure out which verb actually > > breaks things. Oh well. > > Was there something else specific you wanted me to try for this? If > not, what do you think the next steps to get this fixed are? Do you > think it might be good to just cook the partial revert I posted a > while back after all? It's rather a call to Kailang, after all. I'm fine with any way as long as it avoids further regressions. Takashi
