On 5/24/23 04:05, Charles Keepax wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 10:25:34AM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote: >> Cirrus never intended to upstream dual licensed code, convert to >> GPL only. >> >> Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> >> Apologies for this but this was never our intention and I believe that >> it can be a little legally involved maintaining dual licensed kernel code. >> Fortunately not that many people outside of Cirrus have contributed to >> the files in question. I have CCed everyone who has contributed both >> internally and externally. > > Pierre, Uwe, > > Apologies for chasing but it would be really helpful to get an > ack for this one, we need the approval of everyone who > contributed to fix the licensing issue. Sorry, I missed that you were asking me... My only contribution is a two-character change in a header file to make cppcheck happy. -int cs35l45_apply_patch(struct cs35l45_private *cs43l45); +int cs35l45_apply_patch(struct cs35l45_private *cs35l45); I double-checked with Intel legal to be sure, and there's no issue with removing the BSD3 license. Acked-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
