Hello Charles, On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 09:05:56AM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 10:25:34AM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote: > > Cirrus never intended to upstream dual licensed code, convert to > > GPL only. > > > > Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > Apologies for this but this was never our intention and I believe that > > it can be a little legally involved maintaining dual licensed kernel code. > > Fortunately not that many people outside of Cirrus have contributed to > > the files in question. I have CCed everyone who has contributed both > > internally and externally. > > Pierre, Uwe, > > Apologies for chasing but it would be really helpful to get an > ack for this one, we need the approval of everyone who > contributed to fix the licensing issue. I'd say removing a license option isn't so critical; and my contribution probably isn't relevant for the copyright, but INAL and for avoidance of doubt: Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
