On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 08:08:05PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 12/05/2023 18:18, Charles Keepax wrote:
> > On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 05:25:52PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 12/05/2023 14:28, Charles Keepax wrote:
> >>> The CS42L43 is an audio CODEC with integrated MIPI SoundWire interface
> >>> (Version 1.2.1 compliant), I2C, SPI, and I2S/TDM interfaces designed
> >>> for portable applications. It provides a high dynamic range, stereo
> >>> DAC for headphone output, two integrated Class D amplifiers for
> >>
> >> ...
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> + interrupt-controller: true
> >>> +
> >>> + '#interrupt-cells':
> >>> + const: 2
> >>
> >> Hm, are you sure? Who is the consumer/user of this interrupt controller?
> >>
> >
> > Anyone who wants the device has GPIOs that can signal IRQs. Some
> > of the other IRQs could be more generally useful, such as some of
> > the jack detection ones.
>
>
> OK, makes sense, but it is a bit odd then to have:
> codec {
> which is GPIO and interrupt controller, but not pin controller
> pinctrl {
> pin controller, which is not GPIO and not interrupt controller
> }
> }
> Maybe all the GPIO/pin/related interrupt properties should be moved to
> pinctrl node?
>
I will have a look at that although I have a vague memory that
this made the pinctrl very sad doing this. Presumably a bug
somewhere but might take me a while to figure that out. The
interrupt controller is a bit of a grey area as well since it
has a bunch of IRQs that don't relate to the pins as well as
some that do. So logically it might be better suited on the root
node.
Thanks,
Charles
