Re: DMARC (Was: Re: [alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: [PATCH 3/5] ASoC: mediatek: mt8195-afe-pcm: Simplify runtime PM during probe])

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10. 05. 23 5:58, Geraldo Nascimento wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:05:59AM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
AFAICT the only other option is munging the From without enclosing the
message in a wrapper?  That's potentially marginally less harmful but
it's still going to break things badly enough that I'm not sure it's a
worthwhile improvement.

The readymade mitigations for DMARC in mailman 3 are
"munge_from" and "wrap_message". The fact "wrap_message" messes
around with signatures in mutt is definitely not a good sign,
and "munge_from" will change the author's email and name from
the perspective of git-am.

The middle way could be to patch mailman 3 to "munge_from" while adding
the correct "From:" as the first thing in the body of the message if it
doesn't contain one already. This will make git-am pickup the correct
author's details and it should be some simple logic.

Unfortunately, changing the message body will break the DKIM message integrity (body hash)...

				Jaroslav

--
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@xxxxxxxx>
Linux Sound Maintainer; ALSA Project; Red Hat, Inc.




[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux