On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 06:00:59PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 17/04/2023 17:58, Mark Brown wrote: > > You've replaced an unconditional dev_err() with dev_err_probe(). > Which is the core of this change... so what is here surprising? Yes, > that's functional change and I never wrote that dev_err_probe is equal > dev_err. It is similar but offers benefits and one difference - does not > print DEFER. Which is in general exactly what we want. This may well be what you intended to do but it's not what the commit message says that the change is doing, unlike patch 1 this isn't an open coded dev_err_probe() that's being replaced.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
