Re: [PATCH 11/11] ASoC: topology: Unify kcontrol removal code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/27/2023 2:38 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:


On 1/27/23 05:12, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote:
On 1/25/2023 4:15 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:


On 1/25/23 13:46, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote:
Functions removing bytes, enum and mixer kcontrols are identical. Unify

they are identical because of the change in patch10.

Please clarify that this is not a cleanup removing duplicated code
that's been there forever, it's become useless as a result of the
previous patch.


There is no dependency on previous patch - it is just order I've send
them in - those functions have same implementation in current code.

Not following, sorry. What is this addition in patch 10?

diff --git a/include/sound/soc-topology.h b/include/sound/soc-topology.h
index b4b896f83b94..f055c6917f6c 100644
--- a/include/sound/soc-topology.h
+++ b/include/sound/soc-topology.h
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ struct snd_soc_dobj {
  	enum snd_soc_dobj_type type;
  	unsigned int index;	/* objects can belong in different groups */
  	struct list_head list;
-	struct snd_soc_tplg_ops *ops;
+	int (*unload)(struct snd_soc_component *comp, struct snd_soc_dobj *dobj);

That's not in 'current code', is it? How is this not a dependency?

It only depends on it because of order I did changes in, but there is really no dependency here. I will send v2 with reversed order.



[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux